last few years we talk about economic crisis and recovery, often with a hint of triumphalism.
The truth is otherwise, and is visible to everyone.
Compared to the economic meltdown and financial decision began with a couple of years ago in all sectors are suffering, and those of production in particular.
Production and market of course related.
The construction sector is directly affected by this very negative trend of the market, and is manifested by a few days ago the complaint by the associations of a disturbing stillness in the amount of real estate transactions.
The average time for the sale of the properties are getting longer and prices are increasing the minimum (not the historical ones, of course), according to studies.
The construction industry, with its supply chain, occupies over 70% of the total market, and it is not just building materials, machinery and other similar products, but all the rest.
the event that a clear structural crisis whose recovery is absolutely light years away is too disturbing and social phenomena have changed and will change again.
The recessionary period shows a more generalized crisis linked to the financial markets, the lack of liquidity and credit, the inability to make investments and thus innovation, the contraction of production (and also for more complex phenomena, linked to globalization), to distribution, transport (road and not), and also the market of promotion (advertising and rapprestanze).
The construction industry is to be kept under control because it is an extreme size of the labor market that is very extensive, and above all there is to deal with the (in) availability of Italian households.
has heard these days to start another housing plan, but the insistent repetition of a proposal that has been proven in bankruptcy, has all the inability to see far.
Italian households are reduced to the bone, let alone think to expand the home of a hypothetical local (which is allowed only to those one or two-family) to stay home the big baby of the moment with his girlfriend and children.
What is a case for a start new phase of social housing policy?
the early twentieth century there has been much debate between sociologists and conventions, planners, architects, who were forced to abandon outdated models of the 900 were planning to deal with the complexity of the phenomenon of expansion and industrialization of the metropolis.
But what can we assume today?
With the initiatives of individuals (not concerned if large and enlightened) is not going anywhere.
qalsiasi So ... what I would say is better than nothing everlasting, so that it will encourage debates and discussions, and quickly. In our century, the issues are quite different and complex, and especially the expectations of new young families are mowed in the bud, often finding himself also denied access to credit because almost without even the protection of the right to work. What do you expect to
devolves to perish?
I wrote that the situation is more complex, but necessary to summarize, and express a proposal for PGT:
We can assume a generalized provision (mandatory or encouraged) to mix function that allows, in addition to 'utilization of minimum area, a proportional increase in land use shares for subsidized housing?
not avoid in the most trivial of ghettoization of the city, with the inequality of the urban fabric of greater or lesser value.
And behind this proposal is a first reading of the same "philosophy" of RL 12.05, which is to create uniformity of annuities with the expression of a general index, and therefore beneficial for social housing.
integration, equity and more organic and functional systems in the urban fabric.
0 comments:
Post a Comment