A real dilemma.
spoken increasingly to simplify matters (legislative) and yet in our industry is now impossible to disentangle the ordinary laws, decrees, regulations, only the texts, case law, etc..
texts "unique" are those that should be simplified by collecting various laws and repeal some others, it is unfortunately not so linear path.
Some laws are invoked, other repealed in part, and if you do not read the devices, to figure out which paragraphs shall remain in force and which are not, wrong.
The laws are the politicians, not engineers and this is obvious enough, but this anomaly is a serious problem especially when the legislature opens up a confrontation with the trade associations.
The feeling of experiencing a complication legislation is a serious concern.
the evening meeting organized by the Tilane P. Favrin, I perceived among the most interesting speeches, those of some fellow architects, including P. Zago, who has expressed precisely this desire (need): that the PGT is an easy, simple .
In all honesty, I know that will not be so, and already am working with some administrations where the rule of the PGT and procedures that you are facing are much wider.
And trudging single points of contacts, and make it difficult to converse with professionals.
So promises a good deal of renovation also for municipal technicians.
We are facing a period of paralysis?
Local administrators are clearly in trouble on this level and it would be useful to promote a meeting with the associations (associations) interested and involved even more to help the legislature to make up a shared document.
Around the corner there is the enormous multiplication of documents, including those of more practical.
So the PRG had many limitations, but an advantage: they were lean, and that says it all.
Now PGT likely to be born obese and this will depend on how well the system is designed legislature by the same regulatory region.
Before the study was unique, tomorrow will be three plans for further study, involving almost all the work:
1. the Plan document, which is a tool for understanding and address
2. Plan Services, which has the status of services (standard) and programming of the same, where deficient and to ensure the growth of cttÃ
3. Rules of the Plan, which will be operating the most, what will the technical standards and rules for equalization
short, Milan has a complex situation for obvious reasons, but the image you see above is the only descriptive documents that make up the plan, excluding the tables.
Thanks for the simplification, but we are sure that this does not become a deterrent?
0 comments:
Post a Comment